Return

Upon being sworn into the Oval Office last month, President Donald Trump wasted no time fulfilling one of his preeminent campaign promises by signing an executive order to end America’s planned involvement in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The trade deal, which Barack Obama’s administration helped orchestrate, had not yet been put into action. And now it won’t be, at least not with the biggest player involved.

What are the ramifications for the worldwide apparel industry?

First, let’s recap what this agreement entailed, and why proponents supported it. The TPP was an accord between 12 countries intended to encourage open trade and economic growth. It called for big cuts on tariffs, and also included provisions to reduce environmental impact and human rights violations, among many other stipulations.

But while most people can get behind the guiding premise, there was significant controversy within the United States over the meat of the deal. Among the primary qualms, and ones that President Trump cited frequently, were insufficient measures to address currency manipulation and to keep jobs at home.

So, what does his assertive decision to immediately stamp America’s withdrawal from the agreement mean for stakeholders in the clothing supply chain? The answer is: maybe not all that much, for the time being. A study published by the US International Trade Commission last year found that the TPP would have minimal impact on apparel imports and exports. Some other participating countries – most notably Vietnam – figured to benefit but ultimately nothing was going to dramatically alter the textile trade landscape.

This is mainly because China, the powerhouse of the Pacific Rim, was conspicuously absent from the list of signatories. The country’s decision to abstain was understandable enough – an in-depth academic analysis found that “payoffs to China following the TPP deal remain intangible and at best speculative.”

You can read much more about the current state of sourcing China by downloading our free whitepaper “A Fading Powerhouse” here!

That the Trans-Pacific Partnership did not include China – and in fact may have served to stifle their economic hold over the region – makes Trump’s stark opposition to it all the more curious, given that he’s made the nation his No. 1 target in vocal critiques of existing international trade standards. And therein lies perhaps the most striking takeaway from this entire ordeal.

Without enactment of the TPP, business will mostly go on as usual in the world of apparel. In fact, the remaining countries may try to move forward with some form of the deal, though there is skepticism over its ability to float without US inclusion.

Trump’s decision to pull out is a blow for many other parties involved, who were counting on the concessions that Obama was willing to make. The president now claims he will pursue bilateral deals on a case-by-case basis, although he may not be greeted warmly in negotiations after dismantling an accord that took nearly eight years to finalize.

It will be interesting to watch how things play out. His reputation as a masterful businessman helped get him to this position, and now we’ll see if he can follow through.

Now that Trump is turning his brazen campaign talk into action, how will his “America First” mantra be received by other world leaders seeking mutual benefit? And what will happen now with China, empowered for the time being by this development? Trump’s tough talk toward the country has led some observers to ponder the possibility of significant conflict.

For instance, The Economist recently published a piece theorizing how a trade war between the United States and China might play out. It’s a compelling read, laying out several potential ramifications, but the conclusion says it all: “A trade war would mean abandoning an institution that recognises that countries are stronger when they work together.”

At this time, Trump’s abandonment of the TPP and generally isolationist rhetoric would seem to indicate a move away from the “stronger together” philosophy, but that may change as he begins to build relationships and better understand the fundamentals of this delicate ecosystem.

So many American retail giants in apparel, electronics and beyond are reliant on foreign imports to remain viable. Whatever your opinion of Trump, no one can deny his fierce motivation to keep and create jobs domestically. While his banter may be brash, it stands to reason that he’ll pull back the throttle on suffocating free trade.

Of course, we will be watching closely and sharing our insights along the way.

Related Articles

How Cost of Quality Predicts How Fast You’ll Grow

How Cost of Quality Predicts How Fast You’ll Grow

Bottom line: Consistent product quality is the single greatest predictor of any apparel retailers’ or manufacturer’s success and is the [...]
[Report] Download the Latest Report from the series “Innovator Intelligence” by Coresight Research

[Report] Download the Latest Report from the series “Innovator Intelligence” by Coresight Research

Coresight Research has featured Inspectorio in their latest edition of their Innovator Intelligence series. Their series focuses on emerging companies that are disrupting traditional retail and […]

[Report] Quality, Compliance and the Cost of Failing to Innovate

[Report] Quality, Compliance and the Cost of Failing to Innovate

It is hard to believe that almost the entire industry of quality verification and inspections continues to use archaic tools […]

Inspectorio Secures $10Million Series A Financing Round

Inspectorio Secures $10Million Series A Financing Round

Inspectorio Secures $10 Million Series A Financing Round The quality and compliance platform, powered by artificial intelligence, will aggressively accelerate [...]
[Study] The State of Quality Inspections in the Global Supply Chain: 2018 Edition

[Study] The State of Quality Inspections in the Global Supply Chain: 2018 Edition

In an environment in which brands and retailers are feeling pinched by consumer price demands, shoppers’ changing tastes and their seemingly endless options, companies are […]

[Whitepaper] Vietnam’s Very Favorable Position.

[Whitepaper] Vietnam’s Very Favorable Position.

There are 4 main reasons to why Vietnam is ready to grow its sourcing profile: It is increasing its share of exports, foreign investments are helping strengthen the infrastructure, the dissolution of the TPP should slow rising wages, and Vietnam is an outstanding provider for tech solutions.

[Whitepaper] Bangladesh: Channeling Growth Through Challenges?

[Whitepaper] Bangladesh: Channeling Growth Through Challenges?

Can Bangladesh remain as one of the sourcing leaders? In this whitepaper you will find information about how the tragic accidents have affected the nation’s reputation, what low labor costs represent to Bangladesh’s future, the difficulty on improving compliance, and the water crisis in the country.

[Whitepaper] Is China a fading powerhouse?

[Whitepaper] Is China a fading powerhouse?

Is it safe to keep manufacturing in China? In this whitepaper you will find about why China’s explosive growth is beginning to slow down, environmental concerns, labor compliance, and the Quality vs. Volume dilemma.

Quality and Transparency; From words to action through Technology and Networking

Quality and Transparency; From words to action through Technology and Networking

Written by Fernando Moncayo Castillo, Chief Sales Office & Co-Founder at Inspectorio. Hearing or reading about exponential technologies is something [...]
How Much Data is Too Much?

How Much Data is Too Much?

Businesses create, consume, and collect more data today than ever before, and the apparel and footwear industry is no exception. [...]